Optimisation of Trapped Vortex Cavity for Airfoil Separation Control

Authors

Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695547, India

Abstract

The effects of a Trapped Vortex Cavity (TVC) on the aerodynamic performance of a NACA 0024 airfoil at a constant angle of attack (AoA) of 14◦ were investigated in this study. It was observed that mass suction (MFR) was required to stabilise the vortex within the cavity segment. Lift to drag ratio (L/D) and MFR were chosen as performance objectives, along with a fully attached flow constraint (flow separation at X/c ≥ 95% ). Parametric analysis was carried on the baseline airfoil with and without suction and compared to the airfoil with TVC with and without suction. It was observed that L/D increases as MFR increases for a baseline airfoil, and flow separation is delayed at high suction values (MFR = 0.2 kg/s). The TVC modifies the pressure distribution on the baseline airfoil when MFR is applied to the cavity section and there is a significant increase in lift; thus, L/D increases and flow separation is delayed. A lower value of MFR = 0.08 kg/s is sufficient to stabilise the vortex and improve the efficiency of the TVC airfoil. The findings of these parametric studies were used to do a multi-objective optimisation using a genetic algorithm to attain the desired cavity shape while achieving the largest L/D and the lowest MFR (that is proportional to the power required for control) with a fully attached flow constraint. It was found that mass suction and cavity shape both had an equal influence on flow control. The Pareto optimal front yielded a series of optimum designs. One of them was subjected to an off-design analysis in order to validate its performance at other incidences. It was observed that it performs better than the baseline airfoil, with an improved L/D and an increase in stall angle from 10◦ to 14◦.

Keywords

References

Adkins, R. (1975). A short diffuser with low pressure loss. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 297–302.##
De Gregorio F, F. G. (2008). Flow control on a high thickness airfoil by a trapped vortex cavity. 14th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics.##
Donelli, R., F. De Gregorio and P. Iannelli (2010). Flow separation control by trapped vortex. In 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 1409.##
Donelli, R., P. Iannelli, S. Chernyshenko, A. Iollo and L. Zannetti (2009). Flow models for a vortex cell. AIAA journal 47(2), 451–467.##
Donelli, R. S., P. Iannelli, E. Iuliano and D. De Rosa (2011). Suction optimization on thick airfoil to trap vortices. Physics and Fluids Unit, Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali (CIRA), Via Maiorise, snc, Italy 81043.##
Iollo, A. and L. Zannetti (2001). Trapped vortex optimal control by suction and blowing at the wall. European Journal of MechanicsB/Fluids 20(1), 7–24.##
Kasper, W. A. (1975). Some ideas of vortex lift. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper.##
Lasagna, D., R. Donelli, F. De Gregorio and G. Iuso (2011). Effects of a trapped vortex cell on a thick wing airfoil. Experiments in fluids 51(5), 1369–1384.##
Olsman, W. and T. Colonius (2011). Numerical simulation of flow over an airfoil with a cavity. AIAA journal 49(1), 143–149.##
Piegl, L. and W. Tiller (1996). The NURBS book. Springer Science & Business Media.##
Ringleb, F. O. (1961). Separation control by trapped vortices. Boundary layer and flow control 1, 265.##
Rockwell, D. and E. Naudascher (1979). Selfsustained oscillations of impinging free shear layers. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 11, 67–94.##
Rossiter, J. (1964). Wind-tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. Aero Res Counc (No. 3438).##
Rowley, C., T. Colonius and A. Basu (2001). On self-sustained oscillations in two dimensional compressible flow over rectangular cavities. Journal of FLuid Mechanics, 315– 345.##
Rowley, C., V. Juttijudata and D. Williams (2005). Cavity flow control simulations and experiments. In 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 292.##
Vuddagiri, A. and A. Samad (2013). Vortex trapping by different cavities on an airfoil. Wind Engineering 37(5), 469–482.##
Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics
Volume 15, Issue 1 - Serial Number 63
January and February 2022
Pages 179-191

Files

Cited by

History

  • Received: 08 February 2021
  • Revised: 01 August 2021
  • Accepted: 07 August 2021
  • Available online: 14 November 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics