Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of the Serpentine Nozzle for Turbofan

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Internal Aerodynamics in Aero-Engine, School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, People’s Republic of China

Abstract

Serpentine nozzle can effectively suppress the infrared radiation signatures of the aero-engine exhaust system. However, it experiences the remarkable fluid-structure interaction (FSI) process at the work condition. In this paper, the deformation behavior of the serpentine nozzle and its flow characteristic were investigated numerically. Then, the influences of the wall thickness and the geometric configuration on the FSI effect were also explored. The results show that, the mechanism of the fluid-structure interaction is formed through the data transfer of the force and the displacement at the FSI interface. Under the FSI effect, there occur the ballon-like swellings at the second S passage, and the linear section bends upward along the Y direction. They induce the special flow features including the flow separation, the shock wave and the plume vector angle. As the value of the wall thickness increases from 3mm to 6mm, the maximum of the deformation displacement of the serpentine nozzle decreases 68.5mm. As compared to the uncoupled state, the variation of the axial thrust decreases from 2.70% to 0.70% at the coupled state. The circular-to-rectangular profile and the S-shaped passage enlarge the deformation behavior of the nozzle structure. The value of the axial thrust of the serpentine nozzle with 5mm wall thickness for the coupled state is lower 1.92% than these for the uncoupled state.

Keywords


Arif, I., J. Masud and I. Shah (2018). Computational Analysis of Integrated Engine Exhaust Nozzle on a Supersonic Fighter Aircraft. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 11(6), 1511-1520.##
Buchlin, J. M. (2010). Convective Heat Transfer and Infrared Thermography (IRTh). Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 3(1), 55-62.##
Cai, J., F. Liu and H. Tsai (2001). Static Aero-Elastic Computation with a Coupled CFD and CSD Method. 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit AIAA 2001-717.##
Chen, H. Y., Q. G. Zheng and Y. Gao (2021). Performance Seeking Control of Minimum Infrared Characteristic on Double Bypass Variable Cycle Engine, Aerospace Science and Technology 108, 106359.##
Chen, Y., J. Zhai and Q. Han (2016). Vibration and Damping Analysis of the Bladed Disk with Damping Hard Coating on Blades. Aerospace Science and Technology 58, 248-257.##
Deaton, J. D. and R. V. Grandhi (2010). Thermal-Structural Analysis of Engine Exhaust-Washed Structures. 13th AIAA Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference AIAA 2010-9236.##
Deaton, J. D., P. A. Berany and D. M. Prattz (2016). On the Trade-off Between Stress and Modal Responses in the Design of Thermal Structures. 17th AIAA Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference AIAA 2016-4120.##
Dalenbring, M. (2006). Analysis of Material and Structure Used Within the FoT25 Project Propulsion Integration. Swedish Defense Agency FOI-R-2024-SE.##
Fenrich, R. W. and J. J. Alonso (2017). Reliable Multidisciplinary Design of a Supersonic Nozzle Using Multifidelity Surrogates. 18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference AIAA 2017-3826.##
Fraunhofer, (2012). Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI. Germany: Sankt Augustin.##
Garelli, L., R. R. Paza and M. A. Stortia (2010). Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of the Startup of a Rocket Engine Nozzle. Computers & Fluids 39(7), 1208-1218.##
Grellmann, H. W. (1990). B-2 Aerodynamic Design. AIAA Aerospace Engineering Conference and Exhibit AIAA 1990-1802.##
Guo, S., J. L. Xu, J. W. Mo, R. Gu and L. Pang (2015). Fluid Structure Interaction Study of the Splitter Plate in a TBCC Exhaust System During Mode Transition Phase. Acta Astronautica 112, 126-139.##
Guo, T. Q., Z. L. Lu, D. Tang, T. G. Wang and L. Dong (2013). A CFD/CSD Model for Aeroelastic Calculations of Large-Scale Wind Turbines. Science China-Technological Sciences 56(1), 205–211.##
Haney, M. A. (2006). Topology Optimization of Engine Exhaust-Washed Structures. Dayton: Wright State University.##
Hasse, W. and V. Selmin (2003). Progress in Computational Flow-Structure Interaction. Germany: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication-Data.##
Henrich, L. and J. B. Calvo (2011). A Fluid Structure Coupling of the Ariane-5 During Start Phase by DES. CEAS Space Journal 1, 33-44.##
Jaiman, R., P. Geubelle and E. Loth (2011). Transient Fluid–Structure Interaction with Non-matching Spatial and Temporal Discretizations. Computers & Fluids 50(1), 120–135.##
James, M. G. and J. G. Barry (2016). Mechanics of Materials. US: Stanford University.##
Jin, D. H., X. W. Liu and W. G. Zhao (2015). Optimization of Endwall Contouring in Axial Compressor S-Shaped Ducts. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 28(4), 1076–1086.##
Johansson, M. (2006a). Propulsion Integration in an UAV. 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference AIAA 2006-2834.##
Johansson, M. (2006b). Fot25 2003-2005 Propulsion Integration Final Report. Swedish Defense Agency FOI-R-2017-SE.##
Lindermeir, E. and M. Rutten (2018). IR-Signature of the MULDICON Configuration Determined by the IR-Signature Model MIRA. 36th Applied Aerodynamics Conference AIAA 2018-3166.##
Liu, C. F. and J. Qiu (2016). Analysis Methodology of Fluid Structure Coupling of Aeroelasticity. Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press.##
Liu, J., H. C. Yuan, and R. W. Guo (2015). Unsteady Flow Characteristic Analysis of Turbine Based Combined Cycle (TBCC) Inlet Mode Transition. Propulsion and Power Research 4(3), 141–149.##
Melike, N., L. Oncu and A. Aysan (2009). Multidisciplinary Code Coupling for Analysis and Optimization of Aeroelastic Systems. Journal of Aircraft 46(6), 1938-1945.##
Nigam, N. and A. Sricharan (2017). Design Optimization of Advanced Exhaust Systems. 18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference AIAA 2017-3331.##
Pahlavanloo, P. (2007). Dynamic Aeroelastic Simulation of the Agard 445.6 Wing Using Edge. Swedish Defense Agency FOI-R-2259-SE.##
Piperno, S. and C. Farhat (2001). Partitioned Procedures for the Transient Solution of Coupled Aeroelastic Problems—Part II: Energy Transfer Analysis and Three-Dimensional Applications. Computer Methods Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190(24-25), 3147-3170.##
Rajkumar, P., S. T. Chandra and A Kushari (2017). Flow Characterization for a Shallow Single Serpentine Nozzle with Aft Deck. Journal of Propulsion and Power 33(5), 1130–1139.##
Sang, J. H. (2013). Low Observable Technologies of Aircraft. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press.##
Song, F., L. Zhou, J. W. Shi and Z. X. Wang (2021). Investigation on Flow Characteristics and Parameters Optimization of a New Concept of TC Nozzle. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 14(3), 819-832.##
Smith, J. and M. Dalenbring (2016). Aeroelastic Simulation of S-duct Dynamics Using Structure-Coupled CFD. 25th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences.##
Snyder, D., E. Koutsavdis and J. Anttonen (2003). Transonic Store Separation Using Unstructured CFD with Dynamic Meshing. 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit AIAA 2003-3919.##
Sun, X. L., Z. X. Wang and L. Zhou (2015). The Design Method of Serpentine Stealth Nozzle Based on Coupled Parameters. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics 36(11), 2371-2375.##
Thillaikumar, T., P. Bhale and M. Kaushik (2020). Experimental Investigations on the Strut Controlled Thrust Vectoring of a Supersonic Nozzle. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 13(4), 1223-1232.##
Urbanczyk, P. and J. J. Alonso (2017). Coupled Multiphysics Analysis for Design of Advanced Exhaust Systems. 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA 2017-0799.##
Vogel, R. N. and R. V. Grandhi (2012). Structural Acoustic Analysis and Design of Aircraft Components. 12th AIAA ATIO Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSM Conference. AIAA 2012-5557.##
Wang, W. J., L. Zhou, Z. X. Wang and J. W. Shi (2020). Influence of Geometric Parameters on Overall Performance of High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle and Exhaust System. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 13(6), 1959-1973.##
Wei, D. H., S. S. Tang and H. Jin (2017). Analysis and Discussion on Stealth Technology of Aero-Engine. Aeronautical Science & Technology 10, 1–7.##
Xiang, Z., S Bayyuk and Z. S. Jun (2013). Aeroelastic Response of Rocket Nozzles to Asymmetric Thrust Loading. Computers & Fluids 76, 128-148.##
Xu, D. G., J. Q. Ai, W. T. Lei and L. B. Wang (2020). Analysis on Stealth Requirement of Next-Generation Bomber in the Future. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering 9(4), 451–457.##
Yang, Y. C., P. P. Wu and S. W. Gao (2012). Rapid Pressurization Side Load Fluid-Structure Coupled Analysis in SRM Nozzle. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology 35(4), 463-473.##
Yates, E. C. (1988). Agard Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response Candidate Configuration I-Wing 445. NASA Technical Memorandum. 100492.##
Ying, L., W. Zhe, H. Peilin and Z. Liu (2009). A New Method for Analyzing Integrated Stealth Ability of Penetration Aircraft. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 23, 187–193.##