Numerical Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Tail-stabilized Projectile with Asymmetrical Diversion Groove

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 School of Mechatronic Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710021, China

2 School of Electronic Information Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710021, China

3 School of Opto-electronical Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710021, China

Abstract

A surface diversion groove with a specific geometry and position can influence the laminar flow characteristics of a projectile, which may affect the flight trajectory of an aircraft. The asymmetric flow field around the projectile can be induced by the diversion groove, which can produce an obvious aerodynamic force and moment at the projectile nose for trajectory correction. This study applied a diversion groove structure to the nose of tail-stabilized projectiles to investigate its impact on the aerodynamic characteristics of the projectile. The mathematical expressions for the aerodynamic force and aerodynamic coefficient were established theoretically. The change in the aerodynamic coefficient as a function of the phase angle of the diversion groove was determined. A parametric simulation was employed to investigate how the diversion groove affects the aerodynamic attributes of the projectile across various Mach numbers and angles of attack. The simulation results are consistent with the variation trends of aerodynamic forces and moments with respect to the phase angle of the diverter groove, as predicted by the static mathematical model. These findings demonstrate that the variation trends of the lift coefficient and pitching moment coefficient with respect to the angle β approximate a cosine function. Meanwhile, the variation trends of the yaw force coefficient and yaw moment coefficient with respect to the angle β approximate a sine function. The tail-stabilized projectile with asymmetrical diversion groove achieved a reduction of 1.2% in drag coefficient compared with that of the canard rudder corrective projectile, while the lift coefficient and pitch moment coefficient were increased by 6.4% and 16%, respectively, in the subsonic regime. The static margin of the projectile ranging from 13% to 16%. This study offers valuable insights for the design of corrective structures with diversion grooves and trajectory control.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bernhardt, J. E. (2000). Closed-loop control of forebody flow asymmetry. Journal of Aircraft, 37(3), 491-498 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2624
Cui, S., Liu, X., Jiang, S., & Guo, J. (2022). Control strategies for flight stability of trajectory correction projectile with air-ducts structure. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1383294
Ericsson, L. E. (1993). Unsteady flow separation on slender bodies at high angles of attack. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 30(6): 689-695. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.26374
Ganesan, S., & Esakki, B. (2020). Computational fluid dynamic analysis of an unmanned amphibious aerial vehicle for drag reduction. International Journal of Intelligent Unmanned Systems, 8(3), 187-200. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJIUS-01-2019-0003/full/html
Goddard, R. H. (1952). Apparatus for steering aircraft. US.
Hamel, N., & Gagnon, E. (2011). CFD and Parametric Study on a 155mm Artillery Shell Equipped with a Roll-Decoupled Course Correction Fuze. 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3027
Hooker, R. D. (2005). Beyond Vom Kriege: The character and conduct of modern war. Parameters.  https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2256
Landers, M., & Auman, L. (2001). Experimental investigation of nose-mounted controls for a hypersonic missile. 19th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-2433
Landers, M., Hall, L., Auman, L., & Vaughn, M. (2003). Deflectable nose and canard controls for a fin-stabilized projectile at supersonic and hypersonic speeds. 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-3805
Liang, K., Huang, Z., & Zhang, J. M. (2017). Optimal design of the aerodynamic parameters for a supersonic two-dimensional guided artillery projectile. Defence Technology, 13(3), 206-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2017.05.003
Lin, M., & Sarlak, H. (2016). A comparative study on the flow over an airfoil using transitional turbulence models. AIP Conference Series. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4951806
Liu, Y., Li, P. F., He, W., & Jiang, K. Y. (2020). Numerical study of the effect of surface grooves on the aerodynamic performance of a NACA 4415 airfoil for small wind turbines. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 206, 104263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104263
Liu, Y., Li, P. F., & Jiang, K. Y. (2021). Comparative assessment of transitional turbulence models for airfoil aerodynamics in the low Reynolds number range. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 217, 104726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104726
Mariotti, A., Buresti, G., Gaggini, G., & Salvetti, M. V. (2017). Separation control and drag reduction for boat-tailed axisymmetric bodies through contoured transverse grooves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 832, 514-549. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.676
Marshall, D. (2005). High speed aerodynamics of novel missile configurations. [MS Thesis, School of Engineering, Cranfield University].
Massey, K., & Flick, A. (2007). Mechanical and Jet actuators for guiding a small caliber subsonic projectile. 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-3813
Massey, K., McMichael, J., Warnock, T., & Hay, F. (2008). Mechanical Actuators for Guidance of a Supersonic Projectile. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 45(4), 802-812. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.31709
May, A. (1952). Vertical entry of missiles into water. Journal of Applied Physics, 23(12), 1362-1372. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1702076
May, A. (1975). Water entry and the cavity-running behavior of missiles. Navsea Hydroballistics Advisory Committee, Silver Spring. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA020429
Menter F. R. (2009). Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 23(4), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618560902773387
Pan, Z. Y., Cui, W. C., & Miao, Q. M. (2007). Numerical simulation of vortex-induced vibration of a circular cylinder at low mass-damping using rans code. Journal of Fluids & Structures, 23(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.07.007
Pantelatos, D. K., & Mathioulakis, D. S. (2004). Experimental flow study over a blunt-nosed axisymmetric body at incidence. Journal of Fluids & Structures, 19(8), 1103-1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.07.00
Peng, M., Hong-Bin, C., Lin-Fang, Q., Ren-Feng, L. I., & Gui-Gao, L. E. (2017). Numerical investigation on the effect of rotating band on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed spinning projectile. Acta Armamentarii 38(12), 2363-2372 (in Chinese), https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.12.009
Ren, Y. M., Wang, S. S., Li, J. W., Guo, X. C., & Mei, Y. S. (2019). Aerodynamic and trajectory characteristics of a typical mortar projectile with a deflectable nose. Defence Technology, 15(5), 758-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.05.019
Richardson, E. G. (1948). The Impact of a Solid on a Liquid Surface. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 61(4), 352-367. https://doi.org/10.1088/0959-5309/61/4/308
Robarge, T., Stark, A., Min, S. K., Khalatov, A., & Byerley, A. (2004). Design considerations for using indented surface treatments to control boundary layer separation. 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-425
Roos, F. W. (2001). Microblowing for high-angle-of-attack vortex flow control on a fighter aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 38(3), 454-457. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2813
Seo, S. H., & Hong, C. H. (2016). Performance improvement of airfoils for wind blade with the groove. International Journal of Green Energy, 13(1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.910777
Sharma, G., Sharma, G., & Chopra, G. (2015). Computational and experimental study of deflected nose of missile at subsonic speed. 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1-10.  https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2015.7119309
Shi, Y., Hua, Y., & Pan, G. (2020). Experimental study on the trajectory of projectile water entry with asymmetric nose shape. Physics of Fluids, 32(12), 122119. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0033906
Shi, Y., Wang, G. H., & Pan, G. (2019). Experimental study on cavity dynamics of projectile water entry with different physical parameters. Physics of Fluids, 31(6), 067103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5096588
Stutts, J., & Barrett, R. (1998). Development and experimental validation of a barrel-launched adaptive munition. 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-2037
Thompson, K. D. (1981). The use of a deflectable nose on a missile as a control device. Nasa Sti/Recon Tech Rep N. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA112179
Vatsa, V. N., Casalino, D., Lin, J. C., & Appelbaum, J. (2014). Numerical simulation of a high-lift configuration with embedded fluidic actuators. 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-2142
Vaughn, M., & Auman, L. (2002). A productivity-oriented application of computational fluid dynamics to the design of a hypervelocity missile. 20th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-2937
Vaughn, M., & Auman, L. (2003). Assessment of a productivity-oriented cfd methodology for designing a hypervelocity missile. 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-3937
Wang, X., Shi, Y., Pan, G., Chen, X., & Zhao, H. (2021). Numerical research on the high-speed water entry trajectories of AUVs with asymmetric nose shapes. Ocean Engineering, 234, 109274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109274
Wang, Y., Song, W. D., Fang, D. & Guo, Q. W. (2015). Guidance and control design for a class of spin-stabilized projectiles with a two-dimensional trajectory correction fuze. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2015, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/908304
Waugh, J. G., & Stubstad, G. W. (1975). Hydro ballistics modeling. Naval Undersea Center, San Diego, CA. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA007529
Wauters, J., & Degroote, J. (2018). On the study of transitional low-Reynolds number flows over airfoils operating at high angles of attack and their prediction using transitional turbulence models. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 103, 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.10.004
Wu, Z. R., Li, M., Wang, S. L., Yang, H. Y., & Liang, X. J. (2019). Numerical research on the turbulent drag reduction mechanism of a transverse groove structure on an airfoil blade. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 1024-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2019.1665101
Xu, Z. Q., Liu, X. M. Liu, Y., Qin, W. X., & Xi, G. (2022). Flow control mechanism of blade tip bionic grooves and their influence on aerodynamic performance and noise of multi-blade centrifugal fan. Energies, 15(9), 3431. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093431
Yin, T. T., Jia, F. X., & Yu, J. Y. (2018). Research on roll control system for fixed canard rudder of the dual-spin trajectory correction projectile. Wireless Personal Communications, 103(1), 83-98. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11277-018-5427-9
Zhang, B., Wang, S. S., Cao, M. Y., & Xu Y. X. (2014). Impacts of deflection nose on ballistic trajectory control law. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/984840
Zhang, B., Wang, S. S., Cao, M. Y., & Xu Y. X. (2015). Simulation and analysis on aerodynamic characteristics of deflectable nose. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, an International Journal, 15(5), 279.  https://doi.org/10.1504/PCFD.2015.072012