Experimental Investigation on Performance of an Arc Transverse Injection in a Supersonic Combustor Flow

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 602105, India.

2 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Madras Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600044, India

3 Department of Aeronautical Engineering, KCG College of Technology, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600097, India

Abstract

The design of a supersonic combustor ramjet engine has gained significant attention for futuristic air-breathing engines. Achieving efficient fuel mixing and complete combustion within a short period poses a substantial challenge. This study has directed efforts towards improving mixing and minimizing total pressure losses across the supersonic combustor to enhance performance. Experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of fuel injection geometry in the supersonic combustor with an entry Mach number of 2. Two different fuel orifice geometries, inclined at 45°, were considered. The investigation covered four different momentum flux ratios: 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 respectively. Various measurements were conducted to observe flow phenomena inside the supersonic combustion, including wall static pressure measurement, Schlieren visualization, exit Mach number and total pressure loss measurement. Without injection cases exhibited weaker compression and expansion inside the combustor. During injection, the rise in wall pressure indicated that the bow shock formed in front of the arc injection was slightly weaker than that of the circular injection. The impinging bow shock on the opposite wall also exhibited higher strength, resulting in a static pressure rise. As a result, the lower total pressure ratio across the shock indicates a higher momentum exchange between the main flow and the orifice. Therefore, arc injection has proven more effective in exchanging momentum inside the supersonic combustor. Consequently, the Mach number at the exit of the combustor was higher for the arc injection.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Anazadehsayed, A., Barzegar Gerdroodbary, M., Amini, Y., & Moradi, R. (2017). Mixing augmentation of transverse hydrogen jet by injection of micro air jets in supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronautica, 137(8), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.05.007.
Athithan, A. A., Jeyakumar, S., Sivakumar, R. (2021, October). The effect of ramp location in a strut based scramjet combustor under non reacting flow field. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1128, International Conference on Applications in Computational Engineering and Sciences (IConACES 2020), Chennai, India.  DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/1128/1/012006
Ben-Yakar, A., Mungal, M. G., & Hanson, R. K., (2006). Time evolution and mixing characteristics of hydrogen and ethylene transverse jets in supersonic crossflows. Physics of Fluids, 18(2), 026101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2139684
Frey, M., & Hagemann, G. (2000). Restricted shock separation in rocket nozzles. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 16 (3), 478-484. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5593
Fric, T, F., & Roshko, D, A. (1994). Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet. Journal of Fluid Mech, 279, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112094003800
Gutmark, E., Schadow, K. C., & Wilson, K, J. (1989). Noncircular jet dynamics in supersonic combustion. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 5(5), 529–533. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23186
Han, W., Hu, C., Li, J., Yang, J., Wei, R., Lei, R., & Li, C. (2024). Numerical investigation on the combustion characteristics of boron powder fuel under H2/Air flame in a supersonic cavity-based combustor, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 53, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.081
Hu, R., Li, Q., Li, C., & Li, C., (2019). Effects of an accompanied gas jet on transverse liquid injection in a supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronautica, 159, 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.01.040
Jabez Richards, S. B., Thanigaiarasu, S., & Kaushik, M. (2023). Experimental study on the effect of tabs with asymmetric projections on the mixing characteristics of subsonic jets. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 16(6), 1208–1217. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.16.06.1584
Jeong, E., O’Byrne, S., Jeung, I. S., & Houwing, A. F. P. (2020). The Effect of fuel injection location on supersonic hydrogen combustion in a cavity-based model scramjet combustor. Energies, 13, 193, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010193
Mahesh, K. (2012). The interaction of jets with crossflow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 45, 379-407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101115
Ogawa, H. (2016). Effects of injection angle and pressure on mixing performance of fuel injection via various geometries for upstream-fuel-injected scramjets. Acta Astronautica, 128(11), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.08.008
Papamoschou, D., Zill, A., & Johnson, A. (2009). Supersonic flow separation in planar nozzles. Shock Waves, 19(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-008-0160-z
Priyadharshini, S., Muruganandam, T. M., & Kathiravan, B. (2022). Effect of flap deflection on performance of single expansion ramp nozzles at different pressure ratio. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 38 (6), 1025-1041. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B38680
Rajesh, A. C., Jeyakumar, S., Jayaraman, K., Karaca, M., & Athithan, A. A. (2023). The implications of dual cavity location in a strut-mounted scramjet combustor, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 145, 106855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106855
Randolph, H., Chew, L., & Johari, H. (1994). Pulsed jets in supersonic crossflow. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 10(5), 746–748. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23790
Relangi, N., Ingenito, A., & Jeyakumar, S. (2021). The implication of injection locations in an axisymmetric cavity-based scramjet combustor. Energies, 14, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092626
Rothstein, A., & Wantuck, P. (1992, July). A study of the normal injection of hydrogen into a heated supersonicflow using planar laser-induced fluorescence. AIAA, SAE, ASME, and ASEE, 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Nashville, TN, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-3423
Schetz, J. A., & Billig, F, S. (1966). Penetration of gaseous jets injected into a supersonic stream. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 3(11), 1658–1665. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.28721
Schindel, L., & Abramovich, G, N., (2003). The theory of turbulent jets. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6781.001.0001
Shekarian, A. A., Tabejamaat, S., & Shoraka, Y. (2014). Effects of incident shock wave on mixing and flame holding of hydrogen in supersonic air flow. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(19), 10284–10292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.154
Timnat, Y, M. (1990). Recent developments in ramjets, ducted rockets and scramjets. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 27(3), 201–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(90)90007-7
Vishwakarma, M., & Vaidyanathan, A. (2016). Experimental study of mixing enhancement using pylon in supersonic flow. Acta Astronautica, 118, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.09.011
Yazhini, V. I., Kathiravan, B., Muruganandan, T, M., & Jayaraman, K. (2021). Cowl length variation on performance characteristics of a single expansion ramp nozzle. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 37(5), 780-791. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B38217
Ye, K., Ye, Z., Li, C., & Wu, J., (2018). Numerical investigation on the mechanism of the effects of plate vibration on mixing and combustion of transverse hydrogen injection. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 22636–22648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.123
You, Y., Luedeke, H., & Hannemann, K., (2013). Injection and mixing in a scramjet combustor: DES and RANS studies. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 34(2), 2083–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.10.001
Zhao, J., Lin, W., Yan, C., Zheng, Z., Tong, Y., & Nie, W. (2022). (2022). Mixing enhancement mechanism of combined H2-Water jets in supersonic crossflows in a combustor with an expanded section, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47, 10747 - 10761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.070.