Experimental Dynamic Stability Investigation on Orion Entry Capsule in Supersonic Flow

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Aerospace Engineering, Aerospace Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

10.47176/jafm.18.5.2854

Abstract

Re-entry capsules' success depends significantly on dynamic and static stability, particularly before deploying the main parachute. Determining the range of dynamic instability and investigating the underlying causes is crucial for designing the entry capsule's control system. Dynamic stability is analyzed in this study based on pitch moment coefficients obtained from forced oscillation experiments conducted in the trisonic wind tunnel for the Orion entry capsule. The results reveal that pressure fluctuations at the aftbody of this model begin at Mach 2. The findings and other research results emphasize the significant role of the aftbody geometry in generating dynamic instability at low supersonic speeds due to its interaction with vortex flow. The results also demonstrate that increasing the Mach number to 2.2 would result in a near zero-pressure coefficient on the capsule's aftbody, which implies that there is no acting force on the aftbody. The results show that as the freestream Mach number increases from M∞ = 1.8 to M∞ = 2.2, the pressure on the aftbody remains unchanged during the pitching motion due to approaching the shear layer towards the body and consequent shrinking of the aftbody vortex. Furthermore, the sensitivity of dynamic stability to the mean angle of attack was investigated. It is shown that a slight increase of approximately 5 degrees in the mean angle of attack can considerably enhance the re-entry capsule's dynamic stability.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adamov, N. P., Kharitonov, A. M., Chasovnikov, E. A., Dyad’kin, A. A., Krylov, A. N., & Aleksandrov, E. N. (2016). Experimental study of aerodynamic characteristics of a reentry vehicle on a setup with free oscillations at supersonic velocities. Thermo-physics and Aeromechanics, 23, 791-800. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864316060019
Benek, J., Buning, P., & Steger, J. (1985). A 3-D chimera grid embedding technique. 7th Computational Physics Conference (p. 1523).  https://doi.org/ 10.2514/6.1985-1523
Bird, J. D., & Reese, D. E. (1958). Stability of ballistic reentry bodies. NACA Conference on High-Speed Aerodynamics, March 18- 20, (p. 103). (No. NACA RM-L58E02a).
Brock, J. M., Stern, E. C., & Wilder, M. C. (2019). Computational fluid dynamics simulations of supersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator ballistic range tests. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 56(2), 526-535. https://doi.org/10.2514/ 1.A34208
Bukhat Khan, S., Maqsood, A., Akhtar, S., Xie, D., & Riaz, R. (2022). Causation of supersonic limit cycle oscillations in atmospheric entry vehicles. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 59(3), 960-974. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A35211
Chasovnikov, E. A. (2020). Specific features of the aerodynamic moment and the pitch damping of a re-entry vehicle model exercising free oscillations at supersonic speeds. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 27, 331-338. https://doi.org/ 10.1134/S0869864320030026
Cliff, S. E., & Thomas, S. D. (2005). The Apollo capsule optimization for improved stability and computational/experimental data comparisons (NASA TM-2005-213457).
Dayman Jr, B., Brayshaw Jr, J. M., Nelson, D. A., & Babineaux, T. L. (1963). The influence of shape on aerodynamic damping of oscillatory motion during Mars atmosphere entry and measurement of pitch damping at large oscillation amplitudes. Advances in Astronautical Sciences, 13, 357.
Fletcher, H. S. (1960). Damping in pitch and static stability of supersonic impact nose cones, short blunt subsonic impact nose cones, and manned reentry capsules at Mach numbers from 1.93 to 3.05. NASA TM X-347.
Gülhan, A., Klevanski, J., & Willems, S. (2011). Experimental study of the dynamic stability of the ExoMars capsule. Proceedings of 7th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics. Vol.692, p.9. Brugge, Belgian. ISSN 1609-042X.
Han, S., Lee, B. J., Ahn Furudate, M., & Nagai, H. (2024). Numerical investigation of the dynamic instability of a reentry capsule in transonic flow. AIAA Journal, 62(2), 449-459. https://doi.org/ 10.2514/1.J063428
Jespersen, D., Pulliam, T., Buning, P., Jespersen, D., Pulliam, T., & Buning, P. (1997). Recent enhancements to OVERFLOW. 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (p. 644). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-644
Kandula, M., & Buning, P. (1994). Implementation of LU-SGS algorithm and Roe up-winding scheme in OVERFLOW thin-layer Navier-Stokes code. Fluid Dynamics Conference (p. 2357). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1994-2357
Kawano, R., Ikami, T., Nagai, H., & Yamada, K. (2024). Dynamic behavior measurement of new sample return capsule for deep space exploration using transonic wind tunnel. AIAA SciTech 2024 Forum (p. 2147). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-2147
Kazemba, C., Braun, R., Schoenenberger, M., & Clark, I. (2012). Dynamic stability analysis of blunt body entry vehicles through the use of a time-lagged aftbody pitching moment. 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (p. 226). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-226
Kiritani, H., Tanaka, N., Ohtani, K., Fujita, K., & Nagai, H. (2020). Transonic flow field analysis of a free flight capsule using ballistic range. AIAA SciTech 2020 Forum (p. 1990). https://doi.org/10.2514/ 6.2020-1990
Li, Q., Zhao, R., Zhang, S., Rao, W., & Wei, H. (2022). Study on dynamic characteristics of Mars entry module in transonic and supersonic speeds. Space: Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.34133/ 2022/9753286
Liou, M. S., & Buning, P. (2000). Contribution of the recent AUSM schemes to the OVERFLOW code-Implementation and validation. 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference (p. 4404). https://doi.org/ 10.2514/6.2000-4404
Mark, C. P., & Netto, W. (2023). Determining dynamic stability of a re-entry capsule at free fall. Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio, 1-16. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s42496-023-00180-7
Matsumoto, S., Kondoh, Y., Nagai, S., Tagai, R., Imada, T., & Nakano, E. (2016). Aerodynamic oscillation and attitude control analysis for reentry capsule using OREX flight data and wind tunnel data. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference (p. 1131). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-1131
Murman, S. M. (2009). Dynamic simulations of atmospheric-entry capsules. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 46(4), 829-835. https://doi.org/ 10.2514/1.41078
Nagai, S., Hashimoto, A., Koga, S., Hidaka, A., Murakami, K., Tagai, R., & Hayashi, K. (2021). Synergistic numerical and experimental investigations of the dynamic stability of a re-entry lifting capsule. AIAA SciTech 2021 Forum (p. 1107). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1107
Owens, D. B., & Aubuchon, V. (2011). Overview of orion crew module and launch abort vehicle dynamic stability. 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (p. 3504). https://doi.org/10.2514/ 6.2011-3504
Placco, L., Cogo, M., Bernardini, M., Aboudan, A., Ferri, F., & Picano, F. (2023). Large-eddy simulation of the unsteady supersonic flow around a mars entry capsule at different angles of attack. Aerospace Science and Technology, 143, 108709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108709
Reding, J. P., & Ericsson, L. E. (1972). Dynamic support interference. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 9(7), 547-553. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61738
Schoenenberger, M., & Queen, E. M. (2008). Limit cycle analysis applied to the oscillations of decelerating blunt-body entry vehicles. Symposium AVT-152 on Limit-Cycle Oscillations and Other Amplitude-Limited, Self-Excited Vibrations, NATO, Norway.
Schrijer, F., & Walpot, L. (2010). Experimental investigation of the supersonic wake of a reentry capsule. 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (p. 1251). https://doi.org/ 10.2514/6.2010-1251
Steketee, D. (1967). Dynamic stability of space vehicles. Volume 11-Entry disturbance and control (NACA CR-935).
Teramoto, S., Hiraki, K., & Fujii, K. (2001). Numerical analysis of dynamic stability of a reentry capsule at transonic speeds. AIAA Journal, 39(4), 646-653. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1357
Tsurumoto, T., Takahashi, Y., Terashima, H., & Oshima, N. (2019). Numerical analysis of aerodynamic instability for HAYABUSA type reentry capsule. 8th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences. https://doi.org/10.13009/EUCASS2019-288
Uselton, B. L., & Cyran, F. B. (1980). Sting interference effects as determined by measurements of dynamic stability derivatives, surface pressure, and base pressure for Mach numbers 2 through 8 (Vol. 79, No. 89). Arnold Engineering Development Center, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force.
Wei, H., Li, X., Huang, J., Li, Q., & Rao, W. (2021). Ballistic range testing data analysis of Tianwen-1 Mars entry capsule. Space: Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9830415
Whitlock, C. H., & Siemers III, P. M. (1972). Parameters influencing dynamic stability characteristics of Viking-type entry configurations at Mach 1.76. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 9(7), 558-560. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61741
Willems, S., Gülhan, A., & Esser, B. (2013). Shock induced fluid-structure interaction on a flexible wall in supersonic turbulent flow. Progress in Flight Physics, 5, 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1051/eucass/ 201305285
Yang, X., & Radespiel, R. (2017). Longitudinal aerodynamic performance of the Apollo entry capsule near transonic speeds. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 54(5), 1100-1109. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33609

Files

History

  • Received: 14 May 2024
  • Revised: 10 November 2024
  • Accepted: 14 December 2024
  • Available online: 04 March 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics