Experimental Investigations of Self-adjusting Bionic Flaps on Low-aspect Ratio Wings

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, U.P., 208016, India

10.47176/jafm.18.4.2922

Abstract

Self-adjusting flexible flap is a biomimetic passive flow control device, which is evolved by emulating the covert feathers on the upper wing of a bird. The effectiveness of such a flap was explored mostly for infinite or high aspect ratio (AR) wings from low to high Reynolds numbers (Re) in prior studies. However, the aerodynamic characteristics of a high AR wing are completely different from the lower one due to wingtip vortices. Therefore, in the present work, this flap is tested on a S5010 profiled wing of two different low ARs, 2.0 and 1.0, in the Re range of MAVs application. Three flap chord lengths (0.12c, 0.15c, and 0.20c) are examined at various chord-wise positions (0.3c to 0.8c). Results show that the optimal performance enhancement is achieved when flaps cover 80% of the wingspan for AR 2.0 and 70% for AR 1.0. The flap does not impact pre-stall wing performance, but it significantly improves post-stall lift and drag characteristics over the clean wing. Increasing the flap chord from 0.12c to 0.15c increases wing performance, but increases beyond 0.15c provide no additional beneficial effects. The optimal chord-wise position of the flap for better performance enhancement is near the mid-chord for both models. Multiple flap configurations have a relatively lower lift-enhancing capability than single flap configurations. The effect of Re on the flap effectiveness decreases with decreasing AR of the wing. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Altman, A., & Allemand, G. (2016, January 4-8). Post-stall performance improvement through bio-inspired passive covert feathers. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-2042
Anderson, J. D. (2011). Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. 5th Edition, McGraw–Hill, New York.
Arivoli, D., & Singh, I. (2016). Self-adaptive flaps on low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers. Aerospace Science and Technology, 59, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.10.006
Arivoli, D., Singh, I., & Suriyanarayanan, P. (2020). Rudimentary emulation of covert feathers on low-ar wings for post-stall lift enhancement. AIAA Journal, 58(2), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058562
Ayrilmis, N. (2018). Effect of layer thickness on surface properties of 3D printed materials produced from wood flour/PLA filament. Polymer Testing, 71, 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.009
Azuma, A. (1992). The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming. Springer Tokyo, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68210-3
Baljit, S. S., Saad, M. R., Nasib, A. Z., Sani, A., Rahman, M. R. A., & Idris, A. C. (2017). Suction and blowing flow control on airfoil for drag reduction in subsonic flow. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 914(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/914/1/012009
Barlow, J. B., Rae, W., & Pope, J. A. (1999). Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3061735
Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M., Hage, W., & Meyer, R. (1997, June 29- July 02). Biological surfaces and their technological application - Laboratory and flight experiments on drag reduction and separation control. 28th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, CO, U.S.A. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-1960
Bramesfeld, G., & Maughmer, M. D. (2002). Experimental investigation of self-actuating, upper-surface, high-lift-enhancing effectors. Journal of Aircraft, 39(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2905
Chen, T. Y., & Liou, L. R. (2011). Blockage corrections in wind tunnel tests of small horizontal-axis wind turbines. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 35(3), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.12.005
Combes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2003). Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(17), 2979–2987. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00523
Cravero, C. (2017). Aerodynamic performance prediction of a profile in ground effect with and without a gurney flap. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 139(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035137
Gabriel, E. T., & Mueller, T. J. (2004). Low-aspect-ratio wing aerodynamics at low Reynolds number. AIAA Journal, 42(5), 865-873. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.439
Gad-el-Hak, M., & Pollard, A. (1998). Flow control: Fundamentals and practices. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69672-5
Gerakopulos, R., Boutilier, M. S. H., & Yarusevych, S. (2010, June 28 - July 01). Aerodynamic characterization of a NACA 0018 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Chicago, Illinois. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-4629
Hao, L., Gao, Y., & Wei, B. (2022). Experimental investigation of flow separation control over airfoil by upper surface flap with a gap. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 23(5), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-022-00488-x
Jeong, H., Lee, S., & Kwon, S. D. (2018). Blockage corrections for wind tunnel tests conducted on a Darrieus wind turbine. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 179, 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.06.002
Karasu, I., Özden, M., & Genç, M. S. (2018). Performance assessment of transition models for three-dimensional flow over NACA4412 wings at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 140(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040228
Kernstine, K. H., Moore, C. J., Cutler, A., & Mittal, R. (2008, January 1-9). Initial characterization of self-activated movable flaps, “Pop-up feathers.” 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit,  Reno, Nevada. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-369
Kim, S. H., Hong, W., & Kim, C. (2007). Separation control mechanism of airfoil using synthetic jet. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21(9), 1367–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177422
Lam, G. C. Y., & Leung, R. C. K. (2018). Aeroacoustics of NACA 0018 airfoil with a cavity. AIAA Journal, 56(12), 4775–4786. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056389
Liu, T., Montefort, J., Liou, W., & Pantula, S. (2010). Effects of flexible fin on low-frequency oscillation in post-stall flows. AIAA Journal, 48(6), 1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050205
McMasters, J. H., & Henderson, M. L. (1979). Low speed single-element airfoil synthesis. Technical Soaring, 6(2), 1–21.
Meyer, R., Hage, W., Bechert, D. W., Schatz, M., Knacke, T., & Thiele, F. (2007). Separation control by self-activated movable flaps. AIAA Journal, 45(1), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.23507
Mizoguchi, M., & Itoh, H. (2013). Effect of aspect ratio on aerodynamic characteristics at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA Journal, 51(7), 1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051915
Moffat, R. J. (1988). Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(88)90043-X
Mueller, T. J. (1999). Aerodynamic measurements at low Reynolds numbers for fixed wing micro-air vehicles. RTO AVT/VKI Special Course on Development and Operation of UAVs for Military and Civil Applications, University of Notre Dame.
Mueller, T. J., Kellogg, J. C., Ifju, P. G., & Shkarayev, S. V. (2007). Introduction to the Design of Fixed-Wing Micro Air Vehicles: Including Three Case Studies. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.862106
Nelson, R. C. (1998). Flight stability and automatic control. 2nd Edition, Mc Graw Hill, New York.
Okamoto, M., & Azuma, A. (2011). Aerodynamic characteristics at low Reynolds numbers for wings of various planforms. AIAA Journal, 49(6), 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050071
Park, D., Shim, H., & Lee, Y. (2020). PIV Measurement of separation bubble on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 33(1), 04019105: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001099
Pelletier, A., & Mueller, T. J. (2000). Low Reynolds number aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio, thin/flat/cambered-plate wings. Jornal of Aircraft, 37(5), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2676
Rizzetta, D. P., & Visbal, M. R. (2008). Plasma-based flow-control strategies for transitional highly loaded low-pressure turbines. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 130(4), 0411041–04110412. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2903816
Rizzetta, D. P., & Visbal, M. R. (2012). Plasma control for a maneuvering low-aspect-ratio wing at low reynolds number. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 134(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007947
Schatz, M., Knacke, T., Thiele, F., Meyer, R., Hage, W., & Bechert, D. (2004, January 5-8). Separation control by self-activated movable flaps. 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-1243
Schlüter, J. U. (2010). Lift enhancement at low Reynolds numbers using self-activated movable flaps. Journal of Aircraft, 47(1), 348–351. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46425
Selig, M. S., Lyon, C. A., Giguere, P., Ninham, C. P., & Guglielmo, J. J. (1996). Summary of Low-Speed Airfoil Data, Vol 2. SoarTech Publications, Virginia Beach.
Verma, A., & Kulkarni, V. (2021, November 1-5). Effect of self-actuating flap on the aerodynamic performance of flat plate wing at low Reynolds number. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2021-70495
Wang, C. H. J., & Schlüter, J. (2012). Stall control with feathers: Self-activated flaps on finite wings at low Reynolds numbers. Comptes Rendus - Mecanique, 340(1–2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2011.11.001
Winslow, J., Otsuka, H., Govindarajan, B., & Chopra, I. (2018). Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105). Journal of Aircraft, 55(3), 1050–1061. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034415

Files

History

  • Received: 16 June 2024
  • Revised: 06 September 2024
  • Accepted: 20 October 2024
  • Available online: 04 February 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics