Numerical Investigation of Swirl Recovery from a Transonic Propeller with Swirl Recovery Vanes

Raviselvam, S.; Parthasarathy, V.

doi:10.47176/jafm.18.6.3136

Numerical Investigation of Swirl Recovery from a Transonic Propeller with Swirl Recovery Vanes

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 603103, India

10.47176/jafm.18.6.3136

Abstract

This research investigates the propeller - stator configuration containing eight bladed transonic rotor and a stator with ten blades as Swirl Recovery Vanes (SRVs) in order to improve the efficiency of propeller propulsion systems. By incorporating SRVs behind the propeller, the study aims to decrease rotational kinetic energy losses, ultimately enhancing aerodynamic performance. The primary goal is to reduce swirl, resulting in a 4.46% increase in power coefficient. The approach entails employing potential-based design methodologies in conjunction with time-accurate Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. The simulations were validated through comparisons between the numerical and analytical slipstream data. Further enhancement of additional thrust of 23N and improvement in the efficiency of the propeller by 3.47% during cruise phase is achieved. Also, the results indicated a potential increase in the overall propulsive efficiency of the propeller – SRV combination to an extent of up to 3.46%. These improvements are achieved by varying the pitch distribution of the SRVs to enhance swirl recovery. Adjusting the pitch has demonstrated an increase in these gains by enhancing the swirl recovery of the rotor. The flow in the propeller slipstream leads to the emergence of unsteady phenomenon on the vanes. Design modifications to the swirl recovery vanes are deemed necessary for achieving further improvement in these configurations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Turbomachinary

References

ANSYS^® (2013). Academic research release 15.0. Help system. ANSYS Mechanical Element Reference.

ATR (2018). Connecting the Future, Turboprop Market Forecast 2018–2037.

Beaumier, P. (2012, September). Numerical tools developed at onera for the aerodynamic assessment of propellers and counter-rotating open rotors. 28th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane (Vol. 74, p. 99).

Beck, N., Radespiel, R., Lenfers, C., Friedrichs, J., & Rezaeian, A. (2015). Aerodynamic effects of propeller slipstream on a wing with circulation control. Journal of Aircraft, 52(5), 1422–1436. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032901

Dittmar, J. H., & Hall, D. G. (1990). The effect of swirl recovery vanes on the cruise noise of an advanced propeller. 13th Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper 1990-3932, Oct. 1990. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1990-3932

Gazzaniga, J., & Rose, G. (1992). Wind tunnel performance results of swirl recovery vanes as tested with an advanced high-speed propeller. 28th Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 1992, Nashville, TN, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1988-3152

Hager, R. D. (1988). Advanced turboprop project (Vol. 495). Scientific and Technical Information Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

International Air Transport Association. (2018). Future of the airline industry 2035. https://www. iata. org/policy/Documents/iata-future-airline-industry. pdf.

International Civil Aviation Organization, “ICAO Environmental Report 2016”. http://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/ICAO%20Environmental%20Report%202016.pdf.

Kroo, I. (1986). Propeller-wing integration for minimum induced loss. Journal of Aircraft, 23(7), 561-565. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45344

Lombardi, L. (2011, May). ATR, program review and market outlook. 10th EWADE Conference, Naples.

Mikkelson, D. C., Mitchell, G. A., Bober, L. J. (1984). Summary of recent NASA Propeller Research. NASA Technical Memorandum 83733.

Miller, C. J. (1988, July). Euler analysis of a swirl recovery vane design for use with an advanced single-rotation propfan. AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 24th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA Paper 1988-3152. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1988-3152

Miranda, L., & Brennan, J. (1986, June). Aerodynamic effects of wingtip-mounted propellers and turbines. 4th Applied Aerodynamics Conference (P. 1802). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1986-1802

Ortun, B., Boisard, R., & Gonzalez-Martino, I. (2012). In-plane airloads of a propeller with inflow angle: prediction vs. experiment. 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 25–28 June, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-2778

Rohrbach, C., Metzger, F. B., Black, D. M., & Ladden, R. M. (1982). Evaluation of wind tunnel performance testings of an advanced 45 deg swept 8-bladed propeller at Mach numbers from 0.45 to 0.85 (No. NASA-CR-3505). NASA.

Samuelsson, I. (1990). Experimental investigation of low-speed model propeller slipstream aerodynamic characteristics including flow field surveys and nacelle/wing static pressure measurements. ICAS, Congress, 17 th, Stockholm, Sweden (pp. 71-84).

Santhi, R., & Vasanthakumar, P. (2022). Computational fluid dynamics for turbomachinery technologies with a focus on high-speed rotor blades. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.555.

Sinnige, T., van Kuijk, J. J., Lynch, K. P., Ragni, D., Eitelberg, G., & Veldhuis, L. L. (2015). The effects of swirl recovery vanes on single-rotation propeller aerodynamics and aeroacoustics. In 21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (p. 2358). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-2358

Stefko, G. L., & Jeracki, R. J. (1985). Wind-tunnel results of advanced high-speed propellers at takeoff, climb, and landing mach numbers (No. NASA-TM-87030).

Stokkermans, T. C. A. (2015). Design and analysis of swirl recovery vanes for an isolated and a wing mounted tractor propeller. Delft University of Technology Master Thesis.

Stokkermans, T. C. A., Van Arnhem, N., & Veldhuis, L. L. M. (2016, July). Mitigation of propeller kinetic energy losses with boundary layer ingestion and swirl recovery vanes. Proceedings of the 2016 Applied Aerodynamics Research Conference, Royal Aeronautical Soc., London (pp. 56-69).

Strack, W. C., Knip, G., Weisbrich, A. L., Godston, J., & Bradley, E. (1981). Technology and benefits of aircraft counter rotation propellers (No. E-1414).

Stuermer, A. W. (2006, 9–12 July). Unsteady CFD simulations of propeller installation effects. 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Sacramento, California, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/doi:10.2514/6.2006-4969

Stuermer, A. W., & Akkermans, R. A. (2014a). Validation of aerodynamic and aeroacoustic simulations of contra-rotating open rotors at low-speed flight conditions. 32nd AIAA applied aerodynamics conference (p.3133). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-3133

Stuermer, A. W., Spinner, S., Trost, M., & Schnell, R. (2022). Aerodynamic analysis of a transport aircraft with a boundary layer ingesting aft-propulsor at cruise flight conditions. AIAA Aviation 2022 Forum (p. 3301). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-3301

Stuermer, A., Yin, J., & Akkermans, R. (2014b). Progress in aerodynamic and aeroacoustic integration of CROR propulsion systems. The Aeronautical Journal, 118(1208), 1137-1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.03.009

Stürmer, A., & Akkermans, R. A. (2014c). Multidisciplinary analysis of CROR propulsion systems: DLR activities in the JTI SFWA project. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 5(3), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-014-0105-4

van Kuijk, J. J. A. (2015). Analysis of swirl recovery vanes: propulsion system performance and slipstream-wing interaction [Master’s thesis, Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology]. https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:33cc26ac-2e9b-4bd5-a5dc-55756db1f863

Veldhuis, L. L. M. (2005). Propeller wing aerodynamic interference [Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Aero-space Engineering, Delft Univ. of Technology], Delft, The Netherlands. https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:8ffbde9c-b483-40de-90e0-97095202fbe3

Wang, Y., Li, Q., Eitelberg, G., Veldhuis, L. L. M., & Kotsonis, M. (2014). Design and numerical investigation of swirl recovery vanes for the Fokker 29 propeller. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 27(5), 1128-1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.03.009

Witkowski, D. P., Lee, A. K., & Sullivan, J. P. (1989). Aerodynamic Interaction Between Propellers and Wings. Journal of Aircraft, 26(9), 829–836. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45848

Yamamoto, O. (1992). Numerical calculations of propfan/swirl recovery vane flow field. 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (p. 3771). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-3771